Central Plaza

Central Plaza is the third tallest skyscraper in Hong Kong. With aheight of 374 m (1,227 ft), Central Plaza is only surpassed by 2 IFC in Central and the ICC in West Kowloon. It was the tallest building in Asia from 1992 to 1996, until the Shun HingSquare in Shenzhen, People's Republic of China,was built. The 78-storey building was completed in August 1995. Central Plaza was also the tallest reinforced concrete building in the world, until it was surpassed by CITIC Plaza, Guangzhou. The building uses a triangular floor plan. Onthe top of the tower is a four-bar neon clock that indicates the time by displaying different colors in 15 minute intervals, blinking at the change of the quarter.An anemometer is installed on the tip of the building's mast; the anemometer sits at 378 m (1,240 ft) above sea level. The mast has a heightof 102 m (335 ft). It also houses the world's highest church--Hong Kong CityChurch.
Central Plaza is made up of two principal components: a freestanding 368 m (1,207 ft) high office tower and a 30.5 m (100 ft) high podium block attached to it. The tower is made up of three sections: a 30.5 m (100 ft)high tower base forming the main entrance and public circulationspaces; a 235.4 m (772 ft) tall tower body containing 57office floors, a sky lobby and five mechanical plant floors; and the tower top consist of six mechanical plant floors and a102 m (335 ft) tall tower mast. The ground level public area along with the public sitting out area form an 8,400 m² (90,400 sq ft) landscaped garden with fountain, trees and artificial stone paving. No commercial element is included in the podium. The first level is a public thoroughfare for three pedestrian bridges linking the MassTransit Railway, the Convention and Exhibition Centre and the China Resource Building. By turning these space to public use, thebuilding got 20% plot ratio more as bonus. The shape of the tower is not truly triangular but with its three corners cut off toprovide better internal office spaces.

The building was designed to be in triangular shape because itcould provide 20% more of the office area to enjoy the harbour view as compared with the square or rectangular shaped buildings. From an architectural point of view, this arrangement could provide better floor area utilisation, offering an internal column-free office area with a clear depth of 9 to 13.4 metres and an overall usable floor area efficiency of 81%. Nonetheless, the triangular building plan causes the air handling unit (AHU) room in theinternal core also to assume a triangular configuration with only limited space. This makes the adoption of a standard AHU not feasible. Furthermore, all air-conditioning ducting, electrical trunking and piping gathered inside the core area had to be squeezed into a very narrow and congested corridor ceiling void.

As the building is situated opposite to the HKCEC, the only wayto get more sea view for the building and not be obstructed by the neighbouring high-rise buildings is to build it tall enough.However, a tall building brings a lot of difficulties to structuraland building services design, for example, excessive system staticpressure for water systems, high line voltage drop and long distance of vertical transportation. All these problems can increase the capital cost of the building systems and impair the safety operation of the building.

As a general practice, for achieving a clear height of 2.6 to 2.7 m (8.5 to 8.9 ft), a floor-to-floor height of 3.9 to 4.0 m (12.8 to 13.1 ft) would be required. However, because of high windload in Hong Kong for such a super high-rise building, every increase in building height by a metre would increase the structural cost by more than HK$1 million (HK$304,800per ft). Therefore a comprehensive study was conducted and finally a floor height of 3.6 m (11.8 ft) was adopted. With this issue alone, an estimated construction cost saving for a total of 58 office floors, would be around HK$30 million. Yet at the sametime, a maximum ceiling height of 2.6 m (8.5 ft) in office area could still be achieved with careful coordination and dedicated integration.

Structural Constraints:

  • The site is a newly reclaimed area with a maximum water table rises to about 2 meters (6.5 ft) below ground level. In the original brief, a 6 storey basement is required, therefore a diaphragm wall design came out.
  • The keyword to this project is: time. With a briefing in alimited detail, the structural engineer needed to start work The diaphragm wall design allowed for the basement to be constructed by the top-down method. It allows the superstructure to be constructed at the same time as the basement, thereby removing time consuming basement construction period from the critical path.

  • Wind loading is another major design criterion in Hong Kong as it is situated in an area influenced by typhoons. Not only must the structure be able to resist the loads generally and the cladding system and its fixings resist higher local loads, but the building must also perform dynamically in an acceptable manner such that presdicted movements lie within acceptable standards of occupant comfort criteria. To ensure that all aspects of the building's performance in strong winds will be acceptable, a detailed windtunnel study was carried out by Professor Alan Davenport at the BLWT at the UWO.

Steel structure is more commonly adopted in high-rise building.In the original scheme, an externally cross-braced framed tube was applied with primary/secondary beams carrying metal decking with reinforced concrete slab. The core was also of steel work, designed to carry vertical load only. Later after a financial review by the developer, they decided to reduce the height of the superstructure by increasing the size of the floor plate so as to reduce the complex architectural requirements of the tower base which means a high strength concrete solution became possible.In the final scheme, columns at 4.6 m (15.1 ft) centres and 1.1 m (3.6 ft) deep floor edge beams were used to replace the large steel corner columns. As climbing form and table form construction method and efficient construction management are used in this project which make this reinforcedc oncrete structure take no longer construction time than the steel structure. The most attractive point is that the reinforced concrete scheme can save HK$230 million compared to that of steel structure. Hence the reinforced concrete structure was adopted and Central Plaza is now the tallest reinforced concrete building in the world.In the reinforced concrete structure scheme, the core has a similar arrangement to the steel scheme and the wind shear is taken out from the core at the lowest basement level and transferred to the perimeter diaphragm walls. In order to reduce large shear reversals in the core walls in the basement, and at the top of the tower base level, the ground floor, basement levels 1 and 2 and the 5th and 6th floors, the floor slabs and beams are separated horizontally from the core walls. Another advantage of using reinforced concrete structure is that it is more flexible to cope with changes in structural layout, sizes and height according to the site conditions by using tableform system.



16 photos

Building Activity

  • updated a digital reference
    about 6 years ago via Annotator
  • Robin Wickham
    Robin Wickham updated a digital reference
    about 6 years ago via OpenBuildings.com
  • Nadezhda Nikolova
    Nadezhda Nikolova updated
    about 6 years ago via OpenBuildings.com
  • blahdog
    blahdog commented
    wow, a great example of post modernist architecture, and completed just in time when post modernism went out of fashion as people realized how superficial and uncompelling that style of architecture actually was! Great job, Dennis Lau and Ng Chun Man! Way to make a grand statement for mediocrity!
    about 7 years ago via OpenBuildings.com